Toni Morrisons Sula :: Toni Morrison Sula Essays

Toni Morrisons Sula In the book Sula by Toni Morrison, Morrisons ambiguous link between good, evil, and guilt, she is subject to show that these terms are relative to each other and often occur mutually. In her comparison of good and evil, Sula states that Being good to mortal is just like being mean to somebody. Risky. You dont get nothing for it (145). Good and evil are being compared as if they are equal and that is how the book is structured. For instance, Evas anxious of Plum is a complex conjunction of motherly love and practicality and cannot be described as simply being a good act or a bad one. The killing of Chicken weensy is a similarly ambiguous situation from which Sula and Nels feelings are unclear. Lastly Sula, upon her death bed, questions what it means to be good and suggests that it what may be considered bad could in reality be good. Both in the syncopated style of Morrisons writing and the morally ambiguous depicting of characters, cause the reader to question morals and think about them on a larger scale. Although on the surface, Evas burning of Plum appears as a disgusted and un-motherly act (not to say that it isnt ghastly), with more analysis becomes a more perplexing question. When Eva pours kerosene on Plum, it is described as a sort of baptism, He clear his eyes and saw what he imagined was the great wing of an eagle pouring a wet lightness over him. Some sympathetic of baptism, some kind of blessing he thought (47). Eva believes that she is liberating Plum from his depressed, drugged life and saving his soul. The eagle that plum imagines seeing is a symbol of liberty and the wing is a symbol for maternal love as a bird may nestle its chicks with its wing. Even when Nel later visits Eva in the nursing home, Eva approves of her liberation of Plum. She disapproves of Nel and Sulas throwing Chicken Little in the water, yet justifies killing Plum by saying, Its awful cold in the water. Fire is warm. How did you get him in? (1 68). Sula and Nel are both blameworthy for Chicken Littles death, one for throwing him into the river and the other for watching it. No one is going to defend their actions, however whether Nel is guilty or not is a far more difficult question.